4 days have passed since my last post. I dreamed that someone posted a comment to my blog, encouraging me to write every day. The dream was positive, a good review. But, as usual, my unconscious has decided to save only the negative connotations, discarding the rest as chaff. So, I have the feeling I have disappointed my dream fan by not writing. These daily (hourly, minute-ly) struggles persist.
I have volunteered myself to coordinate an art show in November. I am petrified. I am unwilling to let myself be a beginner, to learn things as they come. I feel I should already know how to do this. It will be an interesting experience. This blog should be titled "Adventures of an Introvert in the Land of Extroverts".
One cannot underestimate the significance of the Myers-Briggs recipe.
I had one good day last week - balanced, peaceful, productive. Subsequently, the familiar restlessness-disguised-as-sloth returned. Luckily, but somewhat perversely, this state of being is comfortable and familiar to me. I am unsettled, not quite happy, but safe.
I feel suspended in my brain. My body is going through the motions, but my being is waiting. Since I cannot figure out my destiny, I will simply wait it out. But all the while, I will be expecting the big breakthrough. This expectation will keep me from experiencing peace or true rest. I want to know what will happen, what should happen. Some stubborn part of my psyche won't let go, even though I know it is futile to wait to know the future.
Thursday, June 30, 2005
Friday, June 24, 2005
Today I am besieged by insecurity. I have been visited by several people (not spirits, i think) today and wonder what they think of me, working 2.5 hours a day at this ridiculous job. My modifier says it all - they must think I'm ridiculous. How important is it to display ones talents?
My friend from Sonoma just sent me a link to an article about German mischief makers planting flags of President Bush in dog feces. It was gross, but not grosser than its inspiration.
Last night Keith and I visited a friend for a backyard firepit and ceremonial burning of school papers. It was enjoyable, in a low key sort of way. The chief pleasures of the experience for me, the one prone to social paralysis and discomfort, were the fireflies, the lightsticks, the ashy flaming feathers of burning paper, and the appearance of Sierra Nevada Pale Ale, reminding me poignantly of other, more comfortable get togethers in the Bay Area. But, I digress. I began this vignette to tell about the awkwardness of politically themed conversations among almost-friends. The awkwardness paralyzes me, and I become cowardly and tense. I am strongly motivated by a sense that something precious rests on the opinions and beliefs of the people around me, and am therefore unable to participate in "mixed" conversations. Republicans, conservatives, even moderates seem desperately wrong to me. I am filled with missionary zeal, which makes for an uneasy bedfellow with my mellow liberal leanings. When I start feeling that some conservatives and evangelicals should be sterilized, haven't I turned into that which I despise?
My friend from Sonoma just sent me a link to an article about German mischief makers planting flags of President Bush in dog feces. It was gross, but not grosser than its inspiration.
Last night Keith and I visited a friend for a backyard firepit and ceremonial burning of school papers. It was enjoyable, in a low key sort of way. The chief pleasures of the experience for me, the one prone to social paralysis and discomfort, were the fireflies, the lightsticks, the ashy flaming feathers of burning paper, and the appearance of Sierra Nevada Pale Ale, reminding me poignantly of other, more comfortable get togethers in the Bay Area. But, I digress. I began this vignette to tell about the awkwardness of politically themed conversations among almost-friends. The awkwardness paralyzes me, and I become cowardly and tense. I am strongly motivated by a sense that something precious rests on the opinions and beliefs of the people around me, and am therefore unable to participate in "mixed" conversations. Republicans, conservatives, even moderates seem desperately wrong to me. I am filled with missionary zeal, which makes for an uneasy bedfellow with my mellow liberal leanings. When I start feeling that some conservatives and evangelicals should be sterilized, haven't I turned into that which I despise?
Thursday, June 23, 2005
Long conversation last night about schooling. My neighbor's child is 5 and she is struggling with the constrictions of the public school system. In preschool, her child was encouraged follow the interest of the moment, create his own art, and write in any secret script he could imagine. Now, he is penalized for not rounding his "b", caught out for too much white space in his coloring book, and told that some of his efforts are merely "satisfactory" rather than amazing, astounding, and magnificent. Soon, he will be required to take the MCAS every year, further narrowing his concept of valuable knowledge.
This discussion turned into one about Mount Holyoke, where we both attend college as "non-traditional" (ie OLD) students. There is a peculiar phenomenon at MHC, though perhaps readers from other East Coast and East Coast-type schools will find it familiar. For the students here, an "A" is considered average. A "B" is something akin to failure, losing a limb, being condemned forever to a purgatory of temping and jobs at coffee shops. I am somewhat used to this culture of perfectionism, having attended private school and private boarding school all my life. However, after inhaling a dose of the "real" world over the past 10 years, I find it confusing and nerve-wracking to get sucked back into such a pervasive system. I can't tell to what degree the college, and its faculty and administrators, are complicit in this. Though I have not seen any blatant displays of expectation on their part, I feel they must be part of the problem. For instance, when one espies a small child running amok, one knows that their parent is somehow involved, either through direct encouragement or neglect. The women at this college, at the earliest stage of their adult development, have not created the cult of perfectionism themselves. They have inherited a rich (in all senses of the word) and full tradition. I am not impervious to it. As soon as I received "A"s, getting more of them became if not a focus, then a primary goal for my future college career.
I am teaching myself Greek over the summer, at least that is the plan. The issues stated in the above paragraph have influenced my summer study to a strong degree. Finding the motivation to study without benefit of grading, comparison with other students, and professorial expectation seems impossible. When did I get so far from my own goals and self-interest?
This discussion turned into one about Mount Holyoke, where we both attend college as "non-traditional" (ie OLD) students. There is a peculiar phenomenon at MHC, though perhaps readers from other East Coast and East Coast-type schools will find it familiar. For the students here, an "A" is considered average. A "B" is something akin to failure, losing a limb, being condemned forever to a purgatory of temping and jobs at coffee shops. I am somewhat used to this culture of perfectionism, having attended private school and private boarding school all my life. However, after inhaling a dose of the "real" world over the past 10 years, I find it confusing and nerve-wracking to get sucked back into such a pervasive system. I can't tell to what degree the college, and its faculty and administrators, are complicit in this. Though I have not seen any blatant displays of expectation on their part, I feel they must be part of the problem. For instance, when one espies a small child running amok, one knows that their parent is somehow involved, either through direct encouragement or neglect. The women at this college, at the earliest stage of their adult development, have not created the cult of perfectionism themselves. They have inherited a rich (in all senses of the word) and full tradition. I am not impervious to it. As soon as I received "A"s, getting more of them became if not a focus, then a primary goal for my future college career.
I am teaching myself Greek over the summer, at least that is the plan. The issues stated in the above paragraph have influenced my summer study to a strong degree. Finding the motivation to study without benefit of grading, comparison with other students, and professorial expectation seems impossible. When did I get so far from my own goals and self-interest?
Wednesday, June 22, 2005
I'm working an extremely sparse 10 hours per week in the Science Center stockroom. After checking my email for the hundredth time, desultorily reading The New Yorker, and lazily scanning my Classical Greek syllabus, I have decided to start this blog. Documenting one's inactivity minutely seems to justify it somehow.
I took a break from writing this blog (2 sentences was exhausting) and read a bit more New Yorker. In an article about a nomadic man preparing to raft across the Pacific Ocean, I found this quote: Like many people who behave capriciously, Neutrino believes that he acts only after much reflection. This reminded me of the reaction of most people to my story about moving to San Francisco. To them, it seems like a capricious act, and they confer upon it a sense of daring, excitement, and danger. In reality, I experienced the decision as the very end of a long period of gestation, like giving birth to another species after years of labor. The result was suprising, even to me, but the fact that something had to be born after all that work was undeniable, even pedestrian. Reflection does not always lead to external logic, but it inevitably gives birth to a product that resembles the internal structure of its mother. My move to San Francisco seemed inevitable to me, even though I had no previous stated intention to do so. Are there really people who live only through a process of external logic? For instance, they have a plan that applies to the world outside themselves, and then follow that plan?
Yesterday I had a related series of thoughts. I realized that the good, exciting, worthy events of my life feel extremely random to me. I do not have a sense of "deserving" them, of having to worked to reach them, of being "worthy" of them in and of myself. I have assumed that other people do not experience life this way - that others experience honors, diplomas, praise, and other such occurrences as following a strict internal and external logic. Yesterday it occurred to me that perhaps most lives seem similarly accidental to their owners. In fact, we probably do not "own" our lives the way we think we should. If no one really lives this way, then how did there come to be the myth of the consciously-lived life? How did we come to expect that we would follow a linear path to reward? Like so many other social myths, this one seems "true". I am still struggling with the recognition that adulthood is not a place to which I can travel, arriving in tact with all the amenities already in place.
My first inkling of the nebulous quality of adulthood came when I was promoted to Manager a few years ago. I was 26 or so, and felt in no way qualified to be Manager of anything. I finally realized that no one is really qualified for anything before they do it. Most adults stumble along the same way they did as children, but without the magical confidence of a child. Adults paste confidence on their skins, in the form of clothing, titles, diplomas, money, and other trappings. Adulthood is another myth. Personal growth takes many forms and never ends, but one can never get to adulthood. Pieces of it drift in and out of consciousness like particularly sneeze-inducing pollen.
Addendum: reading about Herman Kahn and post-WWII defense intellectuals in the New Yorker. Struck by this parallel (perhaps pedestrian, but new to me): trying to predict terrorism, Cold War retaliatory scenarios, or the movement of "the enemy" is akin to Phillip K. Dick's supposition about future crime. By eradicating possible horrors several steps ahead of the present, we destroy the possibility of change, hope, rehabilitation, interaction, capriciousness, etc. Since we cannot know with any certainty what the future holds, we attack it at our own peril, and at the peril of human society. Also, our modeling of the future tends to be based on the past and present, while the actual future often holds things we could never have imagined. Defense planning and strategy is inherently flawed.
I took a break from writing this blog (2 sentences was exhausting) and read a bit more New Yorker. In an article about a nomadic man preparing to raft across the Pacific Ocean, I found this quote: Like many people who behave capriciously, Neutrino believes that he acts only after much reflection. This reminded me of the reaction of most people to my story about moving to San Francisco. To them, it seems like a capricious act, and they confer upon it a sense of daring, excitement, and danger. In reality, I experienced the decision as the very end of a long period of gestation, like giving birth to another species after years of labor. The result was suprising, even to me, but the fact that something had to be born after all that work was undeniable, even pedestrian. Reflection does not always lead to external logic, but it inevitably gives birth to a product that resembles the internal structure of its mother. My move to San Francisco seemed inevitable to me, even though I had no previous stated intention to do so. Are there really people who live only through a process of external logic? For instance, they have a plan that applies to the world outside themselves, and then follow that plan?
Yesterday I had a related series of thoughts. I realized that the good, exciting, worthy events of my life feel extremely random to me. I do not have a sense of "deserving" them, of having to worked to reach them, of being "worthy" of them in and of myself. I have assumed that other people do not experience life this way - that others experience honors, diplomas, praise, and other such occurrences as following a strict internal and external logic. Yesterday it occurred to me that perhaps most lives seem similarly accidental to their owners. In fact, we probably do not "own" our lives the way we think we should. If no one really lives this way, then how did there come to be the myth of the consciously-lived life? How did we come to expect that we would follow a linear path to reward? Like so many other social myths, this one seems "true". I am still struggling with the recognition that adulthood is not a place to which I can travel, arriving in tact with all the amenities already in place.
My first inkling of the nebulous quality of adulthood came when I was promoted to Manager a few years ago. I was 26 or so, and felt in no way qualified to be Manager of anything. I finally realized that no one is really qualified for anything before they do it. Most adults stumble along the same way they did as children, but without the magical confidence of a child. Adults paste confidence on their skins, in the form of clothing, titles, diplomas, money, and other trappings. Adulthood is another myth. Personal growth takes many forms and never ends, but one can never get to adulthood. Pieces of it drift in and out of consciousness like particularly sneeze-inducing pollen.
Addendum: reading about Herman Kahn and post-WWII defense intellectuals in the New Yorker. Struck by this parallel (perhaps pedestrian, but new to me): trying to predict terrorism, Cold War retaliatory scenarios, or the movement of "the enemy" is akin to Phillip K. Dick's supposition about future crime. By eradicating possible horrors several steps ahead of the present, we destroy the possibility of change, hope, rehabilitation, interaction, capriciousness, etc. Since we cannot know with any certainty what the future holds, we attack it at our own peril, and at the peril of human society. Also, our modeling of the future tends to be based on the past and present, while the actual future often holds things we could never have imagined. Defense planning and strategy is inherently flawed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)